Denial management services

A denied claim is not a closed case. It’s a claim we push to payment.

35% to 60% of denied claims are never resubmitted and the problem is rarely the denial itself. More often, appeals go out late, documentation isn’t gathered in time, or the filing deadline passes before the claim is reworked. Every one of those claims represents revenue the practice had already earned but never recovered.

 

MedHeave changes that equation entirely. We run root-cause analysis at the first denial, not after the same gap produces a dozen more. Appeals are worked through payer-specific workflows built for the denial reason at hand. High-dollar cases are escalated to peer-to-peer review when a standard resubmission is unlikely to succeed, and every denial is tracked from first response through final adjudication, with corrective action taken within 72 hours. 

Our operational footprint

These aren't aspirational targets.

These metrics are what we deliver, consistently, across all practices and specialties we work with.

80%+

Denial overturn rate

Under 72 hrs

Denial resubmission window

30/60/90 hrs

Deadline tracking

Under 3%

Claims in 120+ aging

A denial without a structured response is not just a lost claim. It is a signal that the same loss is going to happen again.

Authorization requirements are getting tighter, documentation standards are becoming stricter, and payer scrutiny is higher than it has ever been, which means the same gaps keep producing the same denials, and the revenue loss compounds quietly month after month. Without structured denial management, every denied claim is worked in isolation, and the denial pattern is never addressed.

We consider it our responsibility to break that cycle. At MedHeave, denial management services run as a dedicated function, with teams that understand payer behavior, manage appeals aggressively, and identify the operational issues causing denials to avoid recurring patterns.

Where practices lose the most revenue

A denied claim costs you once. An unidentified denial pattern costs you every month.

Most practices know their denial rate is too high. What they don’t know is which payers are driving it, where the breakdowns are happening, or why the same denials keep coming back. That uncertainty is expensive, and it continues until denial management includes root cause analysis, pattern tracking, and cross-team coordination.

The denial was logged, but never truly worked

Logging a denial and working a denial are two different things. When denial management runs on top of an already full billing workload, appeals go out late, deadlines slip, and by the time anyone circles back, the filing window has closed. The claim didn’t lose because it was wrong. It lost because nobody got to it in time.

The appeal went out, but the root cause stayed in

An appeal does not fix the authorization gap, the documentation inconsistency, or the billing rule that triggered the denial in the first place. Without root-cause analysis and coordination between billing and front-end teams, the same denial reason keeps appearing in next month’s report, and the revenue loss compounds with it.

Your VIP claims were standing in the general admission line

A high-value surgical claim or complex infusion denial cannot follow the same workflow as a routine office visit denial. When every denial follows the same workflow, the most complex cases rarely get the attention they require.

Our services

Our denial management services have one rule: fool us once, never again.

Our denial management process has dedicated workflows, payer-specific appeal infrastructure, and a follow-through process that treats every denied claim as revenue worth defending. Every service under this function exists to ensure every dollar you earn comes back to the practice.

Denial management across every payer type

We manage the complete denial lifecycle for office visits and durable medical equipment claims across every payer type, including Medicaid, workers comp, and auto liability. No claim is filtered out by complexity or service type. Every denial gets the same structured, deadline-driven response, regardless of the payer.

Appeals and resubmissions

Every denied claim gets a targeted response based on what caused it, not a generic reply meant to close it fast. Action is taken within 72 hours of receipt, whether that means a corrected resubmission or a formal appeal with clinical justification. If information is needed from the provider or patient, they are contacted immediately.

Prior authorization dispute resolution

When a claim is denied despite an active prior authorization, we verify every detail of the authorization against the denied claim and pinpoint the discrepancy before building the appeal. Documentation is reviewed for completeness and submitted with the specificity payers need.

Payer follow-up and escalation

Payer follow-up is not a one-time action after the appeal goes out. It runs continuously from submission through final adjudication across every payer type. When payers miss their own review timelines, we escalate immediately. Every open denial has a next action date, so nothing sits idle while the window closes.

Complex case and peer-to-peer review

High-dollar and clinically complex denials need more than a routine resubmission, and treating them the same is why valuable claims end in write-offs. As part of our denial management services, we route these through senior billing review, provider-level documentation support, and peer-to-peer review when medical necessity is the deciding factor.

Denial pattern reporting and preemption

Resolving individual denials only solves half the problem. To fix recurring patterns at the source, we track denial reasons by payer, service type, and category, and share them with the practice. Clinical notes are uploaded to the payer portal at submission, removing the most common arrow from the payer's quiver before they have a chance to use it.

Calculate your revenue loss

Do you know how much denied and unappealed authorizations are costing you every month?

Every authorization that gets denied and never appealed is revenue your practice has already earned but will never collect. Use the calculator below to see exactly what that number looks like for your practice. 

Please select a specialty.
Enter monthly claims (1–99,999).
Enter the amount collected per claim ($1–$9,999).
Your current billing performance
Current denial rate (%) 12%
<5% (excellent)35% (critical)
How is billing handled at your practice?
In-house billing
Our billing is done by in-house employees.
Outsourced to a billing company
A professional billing service handles it.
Our EMR/EHR handles it automatically
Auto-billing through our software.
I manage it myself
The physician handles billing personally.
When a claim gets denied, what usually happens?
We write most off
Too time-consuming to fight.
We appeal some, but not all
Roughly a third get challenged.
We appeal nearly every denial
Strong, disciplined follow-up.
$0

Fill in your details and click Calculate now to see your estimate.

$0
Estimated annual revenue loss
$0 / month
Estimate capped at 45% of monthly revenue for accuracy.
Practice name
Specialty
Monthly claims submitted
Average payment per claim ($)
Denied claims never recovered$0
Undercoding loss$0
AR write-off risk$0
Missed appeal recovery$0
Talk to an expert for detailed audit
Estimates are based on published industry averages for your specialty (MGMA, HFMA, CMS data) and may not reflect your specific payer contracts, fee schedules, patient population, or operational practices. Results are for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon as financial projections. Actual revenue recovery results with any billing service will vary.

Our specialties

Denial patterns are not the same across every specialty, and neither is how we handle them.

We work across a wide range of specialties, each with its own coding requirements, payer expectations, and denial patterns that cannot be managed effectively without direct experience in that specialty.

Behavioral health

In behavioral health, missing eligibility or session tracking can cost several visits, not just one. We stay ahead of authorization limits, benefit caps, telehealth rules, and co-pay terms so billing stays steady through care.

Podiatry

For podiatry billing, we make sure modifiers like 25 and RT/LT are accurate, services align with global periods and payer edits, and orthotics always meet payer-specific authorization and DME requirements before claims go out.

Urgent care

We handle urgent care billing across walk-ins, diagnostics, and procedures. From there, we track payor coding rules, facility contracts, prior authorizations, and eligibility checks so claims never get delayed, cut, or denied.

Orthopedic

We handle orthopedic billing, making sure procedures get authorized upfront and modifiers like LT/RT and bilateral get applied well. Surgical cases with implants are coded and billed the way payers actually expect for payment.

Cardiology

Cardiology billing often triggers NCCI edit denials, bundling issues, and global period violations when E/M services and procedures are billed together. We manage coding and modifier logic to reduce denials and boost payments.

DME

DME billing is handled by aligning orders, documentation, and delivery timelines with payer rules. We apply HCPCS coding, manage capped rentals, and enforce refill limits so claims are never denied for missing paperwork today.

Pediatrics

In pediatrics, we handle well visits and immunizations, making sure vaccine administration and VFC eligibility are correct. Age-based coding stays accurate as well, so nothing gets missed, underbilled, or delayed at any visit.

Anesthesia

The accuracy of anesthesia billing depends on capturing start and stop times correctly. We ensure precise time capture, apply base units and modifiers, and handle medical direction & concurrency so each unit is billed right.

Don’t see your specialty? We likely work in it.

How errors in billing start

The denial arrived from the payer, but the mistake that triggered it originated within the practice.

Payers do not always create denials out of thin air. They respond to gaps in the information they receive, and those gaps almost always originate somewhere in the clinical, administrative, or billing workflow on the practice side. Understanding where those gaps form is the first step toward closing them.

01

Not every denial is your fault

Payers deny a percentage of claims regardless of whether anything was done wrong, knowing that most billing companies will not follow up. The claim sits, the filing window closes and the payer keeps the money. Every denied claim at MedHeave gets worked because a denial is not always a signal that something went wrong. Sometimes it is a signal that the payer is counting on no one to push back.

02

Authorization was not verified before the service was rendered

When a prior authorization is missing, expired, or does not match the service that was billed, the claim gets denied regardless of how clean everything else is. Authorization verification has to happen before the patient walks in, not after the claim comes back.

03

Documentation did not support what was billed

Medical necessity denials are almost always a documentation problem before they are a clinical one. For high dollar claims or claim types with a known pattern of medical necessity denials, clinical notes are submitted preemptively. When a denial comes back, complete clinical documentation is provided with the follow-up to ensure the diagnosis, procedure and level of service billed are fully supported. 

04

Coding did not accurately reflect the service provided

A mismatch between the CPT code and the diagnosis code, a CPT code inconsistent with the provider’s specialty or an incorrect modifier are among the most consistent triggers for denials across every specialty and payer type. These are entirely avoidable errors and the ones that a structured pre-submission review is specifically designed to catch before the claim ever reaches the payer. 

05

The global period was not accounted for

Billing for a service that falls within the global period of a procedure the same patient recently had is a denial that happens before the claim even gets reviewed for medical necessity. Global period tracking has to be part of the billing workflow, not an afterthought when the denial comes back.

06

Eligibility was not confirmed at the time of service

Billing a service to a payer the patient is no longer covered under produces a denial that is difficult to recover from. Eligibility confirmation at the time of service is not optional and when it gets skipped the denial is often irreversible.  

Why MedHeave

The practice you run deserves denial management services as invested in your revenue as you are.

Your revenue is not a ticket in our queue. It’s our responsibility. 

Finding a billing company to manage your denials isn’t hard, but finding a team that owns it completely, operates with full transparency, and brings the kind of payer-specific knowledge and accountability that actually collects the revenue is what matters. That is the standard we hold ourselves to with every practice we work with.

Every decision we make is guided by dollar thresholds and denial-type rules

We do not guess at which denials to appeal, which to correct, and which to accept. Every decision is guided by established dollar thresholds and denial type rules, so the response is always proportionate to the claim value and the realistic likelihood of recovery. High-value claims get escalated immediately, and lower-value denials are assessed against clear criteria before any action is taken.

You know where every denial stands at every stage

Denial dashboards broken down by payer, provider, and denial reason are shared back with the practice on a regular basis. High-volume practices receive weekly reporting, and all others receive monthly updates, so there is never a moment where revenue is being managed without your full visibility into what is happening and why.

Every payer type is covered, and none are treated differently

Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare, workers' compensation, and auto liability are all within our scope, with no exclusions and no payer type that receives a lesser level of attention. Every denial gets the same structured deadline-driven process, regardless of the payer issuing it or the complexity of their review process.

No claim is written off without your explicit approval

When a denial cannot be resolved after all available options have been exhausted, we present the full picture to the provider with complete context. No claim moves to write-off quietly, no decision gets made unilaterally, and the practice retains full visibility and approval authority at every step of the close-out process.

We maintain a payer-specific appeal library built for the denials we see most

We maintain a library of appeal templates and clinical justification language built around the denial categories we handle most frequently. Each template is written for a specific payer and denial type, with the documentation requirements, appeal format, and clinical language that the payer expects to see. We do not send out generic responses or create appeals from scratch under deadline pressure.

Everything we handle is fully HIPAA compliant

Every claim, follow-up, and piece of clinical documentation that moves through our process is handled under full HIPAA compliance. From intake through resolution, patient data is protected with the confidentiality standards your practice is legally required to maintain.

Our denial management process

A process built around turning denials into collections.

Every denial we take on moves through the same disciplined sequence from the moment it is received to the moment it is resolved.

1
Denial intake and logging

The moment a denial is received on our end, it is logged in full detail, including the payer, denial reason, service type, claim value, and date received. This is not an administrative formality. A complete and accurate intake record is what makes every subsequent step in the process possible and ensures nothing gets missed, misfiled, or worked on without the full picture in front of us.

2
Review and categorization

Every denial is reviewed against the original claim to understand exactly what caused it. Whether it is a prior authorization issue, a non-covered service, a global period conflict, a partial denial or a documentation gap, it is categorized by reason and payer before any action is taken. Because the same denial code can apply to multiple scenarios, when the reason is unclear the payer is contacted directly before corrective action is taken. This step determines everything that follows.

3
Partial denials are the hardest to catch

When a claim carries multiple CPT codes and the payer pays some but not all of them, the payment posts and the denial hides inside it. Catching it requires a CPT-level review of every remittance to confirm every code was reimbursed. When a partial denial is identified, resubmission depends on whether the unpaid code is a standalone CPT or an add-on, as each requires a different approach. These are the denials that compound the longest before anyone notices them.

4
Action determination

Once we know what caused the denial, we identify the right response path for it. Administrative denials involving coding errors, eligibility issues, or filing discrepancies are routed toward correction and resubmission. Clinical denials involving medical necessity or missing documentation are routed through clinical review, with supporting records pulled and prepared before the follow-up is built. Every response we send is determined by what actually caused the denial, not by what is fastest to process.

5
Follow-up or resubmission

Our denial management services submit the response within the payer's timely filing window, with a target turnaround of 72 business hours from the date the denial was received. Follow-ups and corrective actions are managed using payer-specific templates and clinical justification language we have developed for the denial categories that come up most often. Every follow-up and resubmission is reviewed for accuracy and submitted with the required supporting documentation attached.

6
Follow-up

Once the corrective actions or resubmission is out, we do not wait for the payer to respond on their own timeline. We track every open denial against its specific deadline, whether that is 30, 60, or 90 days, and follow up continuously until a final determination comes back. Every open case on our end has a next action date, and nothing sits idle while the window closes around it.

7
Escalation

When a payer misses its own internal review timeline or when a high-dollar complex case requires a stronger response than a standard follow-up can deliver, we move it through a structured escalation path. That path starts with senior billing review, moves to provider-level clinical documentation support if needed, and goes all the way to peer-to-peer review when medical necessity is the deciding factor. We never leave a complex case to resolve through a standard workflow when a more forceful option is available.

8
Resolution and close-out

When the corrective actions are approved, we post the payment and close the case. When a denial cannot be resolved after every available option has been exhausted, we present the whole picture to you before finalizing anything. The write-off only moves forward with your explicit approval and nothing gets closed out without you being fully informed at every step. The decision always stays with the practice. Every write-off is also reviewed to identify what caused it and how to prevent the same issue from reaching that point again. 

Performance monitoring

What happens when something goes wrong.

Every billing operation runs into exceptions. What separates a good RCM partner from a bad one is not whether problems occur; it is how fast they are caught and what happens next.

A billing batch was not submitted

We conduct an immediate charges audit to identify which claims were not submitted. We resubmit those claims and track them through the clearinghouse to confirm successful receipt. You are notified of what happened, what was affected, and what has been done. You do not find out about a missed batch from your bank statement.

A provider's NPI terminates with a major payer

We actively track enrollment status and initiate re-enrollment before disruptions occur. If a lapse is identified (especially during transition), we immediately begin re-enrollment and identify all affected claims. Those claims are held or rerouted as appropriate while enrollment is restored, ensuring you are not left out-of-network longer than necessary, and revenue impact is clearly managed.

A payer changes its reimbursement policy or fee schedule

We monitor payer updates and adjust charge amounts proactively. We bill at 150% to 300% of the insurance allowable rate as a standard practice to ensure that fee schedule changes do not result in claims where the billed amount equals or falls below the new allowable, which would reduce reimbursement unnecessarily.

Revenue performance falls without an obvious reason

We run a CPA report comparing payment-to-charge percentages across the previous six months against the current six months. This isolates whether the issue is on the charges side, services not being captured or coded correctly, or the payments side, denials, underpayments, or collections gaps. We present findings with a clear action plan, not a general explanation.

FAQs

Questions providers like you often ask us about denial management services.

If you are evaluating RCM companies or considering switching for the first time, these are the answers you need before making a decision.

How long does a provider have to follow-up a denied claim?

Follow-up timelines vary by payer. Commercial payers typically allow 30 to 90 days from the denial date, while Medicare and Medicaid have their own specific windows. At MedHeave, we track every payer’s corrective action deadline individually and prioritize claims approaching their window so nothing expires before it has been worked.

A rejection happens before the claim enters the payer’s system, usually due to a formatting error, missing information, or an eligibility issue. A denial happens after the claim has been processed and the payer has made a decision not to pay. Rejections are corrected and resubmitted. Denials require a structured corrective action process with supporting documentation and payer-specific justification language, which is what our denial management function is built around.

The most common denial reasons we see are prior authorization issues, non-covered services, global period violations, medical necessity disputes, coding errors, modifier errors or mismatches and expired or missing authorization numbers. Most of these originate on the practice side before the claim is ever submitted, which is why the process includes root-cause analysis on every denial we receive.

When a claim is denied despite an active prior authorization, we verify the authorization details against the denied claim and identify exactly where the discrepancy lies. The corrective action is built with the authorization proof and supporting documentation needed to reverse the decision. In cases where a payer denies for missing authorization but eligibility verification confirmed it was not required, that confirmation is used as the basis of the follow-up.

Industry benchmarks suggest a clean claim rate of over 90% or higher, which translates to a denial rate of around 5 to 10 percent or less. Most practices run higher than that without realizing it because denials are spread across payers, hidden in partial denials, and service types and never aggregated into a single number. Our denial management services track denial rates by payer, provider, CPT, and service type and report them back to the practice regularly so the number is always visible and always being addressed.

Corrective action is taken within 72 hours of receiving a denial. How long the payer takes to respond after a corrected claim or appeal is submitted depends on their internal review timelines, which vary by payer type and denial category. We follow up continuously through every stage and escalate when payers miss their own internal timelines so nothing sits waiting indefinitely.

We use established dollar thresholds and denial type rules to determine whether a claim should be appealed, corrected and resubmitted, or accepted. When a denial cannot be resolved after all available options have been exhausted, we present the full picture to the practice before any write-off is processed. Nothing moves to write off without explicit provider approval.

It depends on the denial type. Medical necessity denials require clinical notes, medical history, and supporting records that clearly justify the service billed. Prior authorization denials require the authorization number, approval documentation, and any correspondence with the payer. Coding denials may require operative reports, encounter notes, or modifier justification. As part of our denial management services, we identify exactly what is needed based on the denial reason and coordinate with the provider’s office when documentation is missing or incomplete.

Yes, as long as the appeal is submitted within the payer’s timely filing window. That window varies by payer, typically between 30 and 90 days from the denial date. Claims outside that window are assessed individually and written off only with provider approval when no further options are available.

Every denial we work is traced back to its root cause and categorized by reason, payer, and service type. Trending denial patterns are shared with billing and front-end teams on a regular basis so the upstream gaps driving recurring denials get identified and closed. Recovery on the current claim and prevention of the next one run as part of the same process.

We review the denial against LCD and NCD guidelines, align the clinical documentation with the specific coverage criteria the payer applied, and build an appeal that directly addresses their objection. For high-dollar cases with strong clinical evidence, we escalate to peer-to-peer review to give the claim the strongest possible path to overturn.

You have already earned this money.
Let us help you collect it.

A free audit takes less than 24 hours to schedule and gives you a complete picture of what your billing cycle is missing.

Book a call

We listen and we don’t judge.

30 minutes of this call can save you up to 25% of lost revenue.

In this session, we’ll walk you through

The best time to fix your billing was last year. The second best time is right now.

Most practices do not realize how much revenue is slipping through the billing process until someone audits it. A 15 minute conversation with us is usually enough to find out where yours is going. 

    Your details have been submitted. Someone from our team will be in touch shortly.